Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 295X2 outperforms HD Graphics 630 Mobile on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 295X2 is 854 days older than HD Graphics 630 Mobile.
Advantages of Intel HD Graphics 630 Mobile
- Consumes up to 97% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 295X2 - 15 vs 500 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 295X2
- Performs up to 96% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than HD Graphics 630 Mobile - 51 vs 26 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Integrated • Aug 30th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
3 GPixel/s
4%
Texel Fillrate
24 GTexel/s
13%
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
65.15 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
179.2 GTexel/s
100%
Intel HD Graphics 630 Mobile | vs | AMD Radeon R9 295X2 |
---|---|---|
Aug 30th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2014 |
HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $1499 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 4x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 3x 8-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
System-Shared | Memory | 4 GB |
System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
System-Shared | Bus | 512-bit |
System-Shared | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
350 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1018 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1250 MHz |