The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 270X, however, it's a slightly worse value for money, as it's $647.75 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R9 270X
- Up to 72% cheaper – $251.35 vs $899.10
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 28% less energy – 180 vs 250 Watts
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
100%
Min 1% FPS
42
100%
Price, €
€899.1
27%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
44%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
51
64%
Min 1% FPS
23
55%
Price, €
€251.35
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.92/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon R9 270X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 270X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
33%
Memory Bandwidth
179.2 GB/s
53%
Pixel Fillrate
33.6 GPixel/s
33%
Texture Fillrate
84 GTexel/s
44%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
44%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 270X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $199.00 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 250 W | Power Consumption | 180 W |
| Memory | ||
6 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
103.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 33.6 GPixel/s |
189.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 84 GTexel/s |
6.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 2.688 TFLOPS |
