The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon PRO W7600 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $380.60 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The Radeon PRO W7600 is better in every way
Advantages of the Radeon PRO W7600
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 42% cheaper – $518.50 vs $899.10
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 130 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
75%
Min 1% FPS
42
70%
Price, €
€899.1
57%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
43%
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
107
100%
Min 1% FPS
60
100%
Price, €
€518.5
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.84/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Radeon PRO W7600 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
66%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
61%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
30%
Radeon PRO W7600
Aug 3rd, 2023
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
86%
Pixel Fillrate
156.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
312.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.99 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon PRO W7600 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 250 W | Power Consumption | 130 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 103.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 156.2 GPixel/s |
| 189.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 312.3 GTexel/s |
| 6.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.99 TFLOPS |
