The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A770 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $359.47 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The Arc A770 is better in every way
Advantages of the Arc A770
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 40% cheaper – $539.63 vs $899.10
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 10% less energy – 225 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 167% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A770 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Average FPS
80
62%
Min 1% FPS
42
56%
Price, €
€899.1
60%
Value, €/FPS
€11.23/FPS
37%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
128
100%
Min 1% FPS
75
100%
Price, €
€539.63
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.21/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€539.63
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€323.42
In Stock
GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A770 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A770 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Arc A770 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Jun 2nd, 2015
Memory
6 GB
38%
Memory Bandwidth
336.6 GB/s
66%
Pixel Fillrate
103.3 GPixel/s
34%
Texture Fillrate
189.4 GTexel/s
31%
FP32
6.06 TFLOPS
31%
Arc A770
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
307.2 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
614.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
19.66 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 980 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A770 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| $649.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 900 | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 250 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 384-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 336.6 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 103.3 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 307.2 GPixel/s |
| 189.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 614.4 GTexel/s |
| 6.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 19.66 TFLOPS |
