The GeForce GTX 1650 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 GME and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $27.03 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590 GME
- A faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 20% cheaper – $108.10 vs $135.13
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 GME for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
91%
Min 1% FPS
31
89%
Price, €
€135.13
79%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
73%
Buy on Amazon
€135.13
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€314.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€246.35
In Stock
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
35
100%
Price, €
€108.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.54/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 GME in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
46%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
46%
Radeon RX 590 GME
Mar 9th, 2020
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
45.44 GPixel/s
85%
Texture Fillrate
204.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.543 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 GME |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Mar 9th, 2020 |
| $149.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 45.44 GPixel/s |
| 93.24 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 204.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.543 TFLOPS |
