The GeForce GTX 1650 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 590 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $16.14 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1650
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 75 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon RX 590
- A much faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 13% cheaper – $108.10 vs $124.24
- A better value for money for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
64
88%
Min 1% FPS
31
84%
Price, €
€124.24
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.94/FPS
76%
Buy on Amazon
€124.24
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€205.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€314.41
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€246.35
In Stock
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Average FPS
73
100%
Min 1% FPS
37
100%
Price, €
€108.1
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon RX 590 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1650
Apr 23rd, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128.1 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
42%
FP32
2.984 TFLOPS
42%
Radeon RX 590
Nov 15th, 2018
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
49.44 GPixel/s
93%
Texture Fillrate
222.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.119 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1650 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 590 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 15th, 2018 |
$149.00 | MSRP | $279.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Polaris |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 175 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 256 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
53.28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 49.44 GPixel/s |
| 93.24 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 222.5 GTexel/s |
| 2.984 TFLOPS | FP32 | 7.119 TFLOPS |
