The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q is a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
- Consumes up to 73% less energy – 75 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Average FPS
54
83%
Min 1% FPS
25
78%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Average FPS
65
100%
Min 1% FPS
32
100%
Price, €
€269.37
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.14/FPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q vs Radeon R9 290 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q
Jan 3rd, 2018
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
35%
Pixel Fillrate
41.31 GPixel/s
68%
Texture Fillrate
61.97 GTexel/s
41%
FP32
1.983 TFLOPS
41%
Radeon R9 290
Nov 5th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
60.61 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
151.5 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.849 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1050 Ti Max-Q | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $399.00 |
| GeForce 10 Mobile | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
75 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 112.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 41.31 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 60.61 GPixel/s |
| 61.97 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 151.5 GTexel/s |
| 1.983 TFLOPS | FP32 | 4.849 TFLOPS |
