Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 640M LE on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3547 days newer than GeForce GT 640M LE.
Advantages of GeForce GT 640M LE
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 32 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 433% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than GeForce GT 640M LE - 32 vs 6 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 640M LE - 4 vs 2 GB
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
32
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €189.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • May 4th, 2012
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • May 4th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
3.012 GPixel/s
4%
Texel Fillrate
12.05 GTexel/s
11%
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 640M LE | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
May 4th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
50.24 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
753 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
785 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |