Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon Pro W6400 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 484 days newer than Radeon Pro W6400.
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 50 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 38% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Radeon Pro W6400 - 94 vs 68 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 16 vs 4 GB
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
68
72%
Value, €/FPS
€2.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €189.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7199 minutes ago
Currently Out of Stock
Out of Stock
Updated 7199 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
32%
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro W6400 | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 40 |
Not Available | MSRP | $499 |
2x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
2331 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
2331 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1750 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |