Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 635M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 3590 days newer than GeForce GT 635M.
Advantages of GeForce GT 635M
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 33 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 400% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than GeForce GT 635M - 40 vs 8 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 635M - 4 vs 1 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
40
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €189.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 22nd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 635M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Mar 22nd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 600M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
660 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |