The GeForce GT 520M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the GeForce GT 520M
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 12 vs 115 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 1 GB
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Average FPS
39
80%
Min 1% FPS
14
67%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
100%
Min 1% FPS
21
100%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 520M vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 520M
Jan 5th, 2011
Memory
1 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
12%
Pixel Fillrate
1.344 GPixel/s
8%
Texture Fillrate
5.376 GTexel/s
9%
FP32
129 GFLOPS
7%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 520M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
| GeForce 500M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
12 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
| 1 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
| 12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 1.344 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
| 5.376 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
| 129 GFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
