Key Differences
In short — Radeon Pro W6400 outperforms GeForce GT 520M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both GPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon Pro W6400 is 4032 days newer than GeForce GT 520M.
Advantages of GeForce GT 520M
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W6400 - 12 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of Radeon Pro W6400
- Performs up to 1100% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than GeForce GT 520M - 12 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 520M - 4 vs 1 GB
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
FPS
12
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €189.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 272 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Mobile • Jan 5th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jan 19th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
74.59 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
111.9 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce GT 520M | vs | Radeon Pro W6400 |
---|---|---|
Jan 5th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
GeForce 500M | Generation | Radeon Pro |
Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
None | Outputs | 2x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
672 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2331 MHz |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |