The GeForce GT 430 is the comparison's loser – it's a much slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R5 240 OEM and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $72.08 more expensive!
Advantages of the GeForce GT 430
- Consumes up to 2% less energy – 49 vs 50 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R5 240 OEM
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 59% cheaper – $49.54 vs $121.62
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 2 vs 0 GB
GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GT 430
Oct 11th, 2010
Average FPS
39
98%
Min 1% FPS
14
93%
Price, €
€121.62
40%
Value, €/FPS
€3.11/FPS
40%
Buy on Amazon
€121.62
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€73.58
In Stock
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Average FPS
40
100%
Min 1% FPS
15
100%
Price, €
€49.54
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GT 430 vs Radeon R5 240 OEM in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GT 430
Oct 11th, 2010
Memory
0.5 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
12.8 GB/s
89%
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
45%
Texture Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
60%
FP32
268.8 GFLOPS
45%
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Nov 1st, 2013
Memory
2 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
14.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
599 GFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GT 430 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R5 240 OEM |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 11th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 1st, 2013 |
| $79.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
49 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
| 0.5 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| DDR3 | Memory Type | DDR3 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
| 12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 2.8 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 6.24 GPixel/s |
| 11.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 18.72 GTexel/s |
| 268.8 GFLOPS | FP32 | 599 GFLOPS |
