Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R5 240 OEM is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 1999 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Up to 66% better value when playing Elden Ring than GeForce GTX 1650 - $1.46 vs $4.33 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 50 vs 75 Watts
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 53% better in Elden Ring than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 52 vs 34 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
FPS
34
65%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€49.54
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €49.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7184 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
52
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.33/FPS
34%
Price, €
€225.21
21%
FPS Winner
Buy for €225.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7183 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
12%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
20%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 16 |
Not Available | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |