The Arc A370M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R7 260X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A370M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 35 vs 115 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon R7 260X
The Arc A370M is better in every way
Arc A370M vs Radeon R7 260X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Average FPS
63
100%
Min 1% FPS
31
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Average FPS
49
78%
Min 1% FPS
21
68%
Price, €
€180.17
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.67/FPS
100%
Arc A370M vs Radeon R7 260X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A370M vs Radeon R7 260X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A370M vs Radeon R7 260X in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A370M
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R7 260X
Oct 8th, 2013
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
104 GB/s
93%
Pixel Fillrate
17.6 GPixel/s
27%
Texture Fillrate
61.6 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
1.971 TFLOPS
47%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A370M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R7 260X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $139.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
35 W | Power Consumption | 115 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
112 GB/s | Bandwidth | 104 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
65.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 17.6 GPixel/s |
131.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 61.6 GTexel/s |
4.198 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.971 TFLOPS |
