The Arc A310 is a slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 290X. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Arc A310
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 30 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 290X
- A much faster GPU for gaming
Arc A310 vs Radeon R9 290X for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, €
€189.19
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.82/FPS
100%
Arc A310 vs Radeon R9 290X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Arc A310 vs Radeon R9 290X in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Arc A310 vs Radeon R9 290X in core GPU performance specifications
Arc A310
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
124 GB/s
39%
Pixel Fillrate
28 GPixel/s
44%
Texture Fillrate
56 GTexel/s
32%
FP32
2.688 TFLOPS
48%
Radeon R9 290X
Oct 24th, 2013
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
176 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.632 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Arc A310 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 290X |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 24th, 2013 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $549.00 |
| Alchemist | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 290 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 124 GB/s | Bandwidth | 320 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 28 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
| 56 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 176 GTexel/s |
| 2.688 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.632 TFLOPS |
