Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms the cheaper Radeon R9 290X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Radeon R9 290X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 3493 days newer than the cheaper Radeon R9 290X.
Advantages of Radeon R9 290X
- Up to 68% cheaper than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $170.44 vs $530.79
- Up to 33% better value when playing God of War than GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - $3.86 vs $5.72 per FPS
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 110% better in God of War than Radeon R9 290X - 103 vs 49 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 165 vs 290 Watts
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 290X - 16 vs 4 GB
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
FPS
49
48%
Value, €/FPS
€3.86/FPS
100%
Price, €
€189.19
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €189.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.72/FPS
67%
Price, €
€589.18
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for €589.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 256 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 24th, 2013
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon R9 290X | vs | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
---|---|---|
Oct 24th, 2013 | Release Date | May 18th, 2023 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 40 |
$549 | MSRP | $499 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 16-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 16 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
512-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
1000 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2310 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 2535 MHz |
1250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2250 MHz |