Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 840 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 6% better in War Thunder than GeForce GT 620 - 219 vs 206 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 2 vs 1 GB
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 49 vs 190 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon R9 285 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2014 | Release Date | May 15th, 2012 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | GeForce 600 |
$249 | MSRP | Not Available |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
2x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | DDR3 |
256-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
176 GB/s | Bandwidth | 14.4 GB/s |
918 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 700 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1375 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 900 MHz |