Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 280X outperforms GeForce GT 620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 280X is 511 days newer than GeForce GT 620.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 620
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 280X - 49 vs 250 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 280X
- Performs up to 300% better in Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands than GeForce GT 620 - 28 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 200% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 - 3 vs 1 GB
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Radeon R9 280X
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GT 620
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Pixel Fillrate
2.8 GPixel/s
8.75%
Texel Fillrate
11.2 GTexel/s
8.75%
NVIDIA GeForce GT 620 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 280X |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 8th, 2013 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $299 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 3 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Bus | 384-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 288 GB/s |
| 700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 850 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
