Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1754 days older than Radeon Pro 5600M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 2% better in Overwatch 2 than Radeon Pro 5600M - 90 vs 88 FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
71%
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Jun 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
HBM2 | Type | HBM |
2048-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
394.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
822 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
1144 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
770 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |