Key Differences
In short — Radeon R5 230 outperforms Radeon Pro 5600M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R5 230 is 2265 days older than Radeon Pro 5600M.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro 5600M
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 230 - 8 vs 1 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 230
- Performs up to 39% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro 5600M - 78 vs 56 FPS
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro 5600M - 19 vs 50 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Radeon Pro 5600M
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Radeon R5 230
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Radeon Pro 5600M
Mobile • Jun 15th, 2020
Pixel Fillrate
73.22 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
183 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro 5600M | vs | AMD Radeon R5 230 |
|---|---|---|
Jun 15th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2014 |
| Radeon Pro Mac | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA |
| None | Power Connectors | None |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 1 GB |
| HBM2 | Type | DDR3 |
| 2048-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
394.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 10.67 GB/s |
822 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 625 MHz |
| 1144 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
770 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 667 MHz |
