Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon X5660 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 4578 days newer than Xeon X5660.
Advantages of Xeon X5660
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 95 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 41% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Xeon X5660 - 162 vs 115 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5660 - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5660 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€771.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €771.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon X5660 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 170 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |