Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms Xeon W-3375 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 425 days newer than Xeon W-3375.
Advantages of Xeon W-3375
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 9 7950X - 76 vs 32 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Xeon W-3375 - 303 vs 277 FPS
- Consumes up to 37% less energy than Intel Xeon W-3375 - 170 vs 270 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W-3375 doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
303
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.54/FPS
100%
Price, €
€771.1
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €771.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6734 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • Jul 29th, 2021
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon W-3375 | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X |
---|---|---|
Jul 29th, 2021 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon W | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ice Lake | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 4189 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
38 | Cores | 16 |
76 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
270 W | TDP | 170 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |