Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700 outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700 is 2765 days newer than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Performs up to 13% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 141 vs 125 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
141
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€164.19
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €164.19 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2680 v3 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Haswell | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |