Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7800X3D outperforms Xeon E5-2643 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7800X3D is 3412 days newer than Xeon E5-2643 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 7800X3D
- Performs up to 26% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 216 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2643 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
216
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.26/FPS
100%
Price, €
€489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2643 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | No |