Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 2622 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E5-2620 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 59% better in Dead Island 2 than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 184 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dead Island 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€489
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 184 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 9 5900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |