Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 3422 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 15% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 195 vs 169 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
195
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€219.2
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €219.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-2620 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |