Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 3166 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 9% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Xeon E5-1620 - 324 vs 298 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 12 vs 8 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
324
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.98/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2062 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |