Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms Xeon E5-1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3857 days newer than Xeon E5-1620.
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 115% better in Assassin's Creed Mirage than Xeon E5-1620 - 155 vs 72 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1620 doesn't have integrated graphics
Assassin's Creed Mirage
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
155
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€392.14
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €392.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2254 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • Mar 6th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 6th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge-EP | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |