Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 1112 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 7% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 192 vs 180 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 7 3700X |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 140 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
