Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms Xeon E5-1620 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 1599 days newer than Xeon E5-1620 v4.
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 192 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1620 v4 - 12 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€319
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €319 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |