The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is a much slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 5 3500X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Xeon E5-1620 v4
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 8 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the Ryzen 5 3500X
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 54% less energy – 65 vs 140 Watts
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3500X for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
180
95%
Min 1% FPS
120
96%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Ryzen 5 3500X
Sep 24th, 2019
Average FPS
189
100%
Min 1% FPS
125
100%
Price, €
€89
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.47/FPS
100%
Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3500X in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3500X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3500X in core CPU performance specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
67%
L3 Cache
10 MB
31%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
93%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
75%
Ryzen 5 3500X
Sep 24th, 2019
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Xeon E5-1620 v4 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 5 3500X |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Sep 24th, 2019 |
$294.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Broadwell-E/EP | Codename | Matisse |
140 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
Performance | ||
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.1 GHz |
10 MB | L3 Cache | 32 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 2400 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
No | Integrated Graphics | No |
No | Overclockable | Yes |