Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms Xeon E3-1290 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3612 days newer than Xeon E3-1290 v2.
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 28% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 120 vs 94 FPS
- Consumes up to 25% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 65 vs 87 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1290 v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
120
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.4/FPS
100%
Price, €
€167.69
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €167.69 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1290 v2 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
87 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |