Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 9 7950X3D outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X3D is 904 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X3D
- Performs up to 44% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 579 vs 402 FPS
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €1169.00 vs €1312.78
- Up to 38% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - €2.02 vs €3.27 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 120 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
402
69%
Value, €/FPS
€3.27/FPS
62%
Price, €
€1312.78
89%
Buy for €1,312.78 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1169
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,169 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 41 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX | vs | Ryzen 9 7950X3D |
---|---|---|
Jul 14th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket WRX8 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.7 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 120 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |