Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 16 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900K - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 5% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 136 vs 130 FPS
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €21.08 vs €359.99
- Up to 94% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €0.16 vs €2.77 per FPS
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 286 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €21.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8850 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 8 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 95 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |