Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Core i3-10100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 559 days older than the more expensive Core i3-10100.
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 3% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-10100 - 427 vs 416 FPS
- Up to 81% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - €21.08 vs €110.24
- Up to 81% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-10100 - €0.05 vs €0.26 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 16 vs 8 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
427
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.05/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €21.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8661 minutes ago
Buy for €110.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8661 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-9900K | vs | Core i3-10100 |
---|---|---|
Oct 19th, 2018 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i3 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |