Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 1455 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Up to 27% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €359.99 vs €491.89
- Up to 15% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i9-13900KF - €1.76 vs €2.08 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Escape From Tarkov than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 236 vs 205 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
205
87%
Value, €/FPS
€1.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€359.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €359.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 407 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
236
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
85%
Price, €
€491.89
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €491.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X | vs | Core i9-13900KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i9 |
Colfax | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 24 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
12 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |