Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i9-12900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-12900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KF is 327 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-12900K.
Advantages of Core i9-13900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield V than Core i9-12900K - 294 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Core i9-12900K
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-13900KF - €467.41 vs €493.80
- Up to 1% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i9-13900KF - €1.66 vs €1.68 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
294
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.68/FPS
99%
Price, €
€493.8
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for €493.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
281
96%
Value, €/FPS
€1.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€467.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €467.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-13900KF | vs | Core i9-12900K |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |