Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7950X outperforms the cheaper Core i9-13900F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-13900F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 7950X is 99 days older than the cheaper Core i9-13900F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 7950X
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Core i9-13900F - 582 vs 551 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-13900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-13900F
- Up to 40% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7950X - €462.56 vs €771.10
- Up to 36% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 9 7950X - €0.84 vs €1.32 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €771.1 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1467 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
551
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€462.56
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €462.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1467 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 7950X | vs | Core i9-13900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raphael | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
4.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
170 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
45.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |