Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5900X outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 9 5900X is 189 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5900X
- Performs up to 6% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Core i5-10400F - 230 vs 217 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 24 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 58% cheaper than Ryzen 9 5900X - €205.00 vs €489.00
- Up to 56% better value when playing Mass Effect: Andromeda than Ryzen 9 5900X - €0.94 vs €2.13 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5900X - 65 vs 105 Watts
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €489 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6383 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
217
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.94/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 9 5900X | vs | Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 5th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Ryzen 9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Vermeer | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 | Cores | 6 |
24 | Threads | 12 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
105 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |