Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms the cheaper Core i5-10400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-10400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-10400F.
Advantages of Core i5-10400F
- Up to 24% cheaper than Ryzen 7 8700G - €205.00 vs €269.75
- Up to 7% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 7 8700G - €1.92 vs €2.06 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i5-10400F - 131 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-10400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
107
82%
Value, €/FPS
€1.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€205
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 45 minutes ago
Buy for €269.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 336 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-10400F | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |