The Ryzen 7 7700X is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the Celeron G6900, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's €280.77 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 7 7700X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 2 threads
Advantages of the Celeron G6900
- Up to 80% cheaper – €70.90 vs €351.67
- A much better value for money for gaming
Ryzen 7 7700X vs Celeron G6900 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 7 7700X
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
221
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, €
€351.67
20%
Value, €/FPS
€1.59/FPS
23%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
192
87%
Min 1% FPS
127
88%
Price, €
€70.9
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.36/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 7700X vs Celeron G6900 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 7 7700X vs Celeron G6900 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 7 7700X vs Celeron G6900 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 7 7700X
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Celeron G6900
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
4 MB
12%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
76%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
92%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 7 7700X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
$399.00 | MSRP | $52.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
AMD Socket AM5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Raphael | Codename | Alder Lake |
105 W | Power Consumption | Not Available |
Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 2 |
16 | Threads | 2 |
4.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.4 GHz |
5.4 GHz | Turbo Frequency | Non-Turbo |
32 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR5 @ 5200 MHz | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Radeon Graphics | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |