Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 471 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G
- Up to 39% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - €122.84 vs €202.51
- Up to 31% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i5-12600KF - €0.70 vs €1.01 per FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-12600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 14% better in No Man's Sky than Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 200 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G - 16 vs 8 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
176
88%
Value, €/FPS
€0.7/FPS
100%
Price, €
€122.84
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €122.84 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7115 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
69%
Price, €
€202.51
60%
FPS Winner
Buy for €202.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7115 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 PRO 4350G | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2020 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Not Available | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Radeon Vega 6 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |