Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-12600KF on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-12600KF is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 712 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-12600KF.
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i9-14900KF - €202.51 vs €468.37
- Up to 53% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-14900KF - €1.01 vs €2.15 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in No Man's Sky than Core i5-12600KF - 218 vs 200 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12600KF - 32 vs 16 threads
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
200
92%
Value, €/FPS
€1.01/FPS
100%
Price, €
€202.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €202.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6300 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
218
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.15/FPS
47%
Price, €
€468.37
43%
FPS Winner
Buy for €468.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6299 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i5-12600KF | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 24 |
16 | Threads | 32 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |