Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-9900K outperforms the more expensive Ryzen 3 4100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-9900K is 1263 days older than the more expensive Ryzen 3 4100.
Advantages of Ryzen 3 4100
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-9900K
- Performs up to 2% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 3 4100 - 125 vs 123 FPS
- Up to 79% cheaper than Ryzen 3 4100 - €21.08 vs €102.22
- Up to 80% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 3 4100 - €0.17 vs €0.83 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 4100 - 16 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €102.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8845 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.17/FPS
100%
Price, €
€21.08
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €21.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8846 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen 3 4100 | vs | Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Not Available | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |