Key Differences
In short — Core i5-3330 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-3330 is 567 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-3330 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-3330
- Performs up to 0% better in DOOM Eternal than Xeon X5675 - 454 vs 452 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 77 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
454
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€40.13
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €40.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8356 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-3330 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 77 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |