Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3460 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3460 is 1253 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3460 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3460
- Performs up to 2% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon X5675 - 101 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.41/FPS
100%
Price, €
€41.87
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €41.87 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60970 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Pentium G3460 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2014 |
Xeon | Collection | Pentium |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |