Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400 is 3363 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400
- Performs up to 7% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon X5675 - 159 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
159
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.76/FPS
100%
Price, €
€120.06
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €120.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i5 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
12 | Threads | 12 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |