Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon X5675 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1660 days newer than Xeon X5675.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5675
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 18% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Xeon X5675 - 532 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon X5675 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon X5675 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
532
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Feb 14th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5675 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
Feb 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i3 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |