Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900X outperforms Xeon X5650 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900X is 3139 days newer than Xeon X5650.
Advantages of Intel Xeon X5650
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 95 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Performs up to 20% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon X5650 - 108 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon X5650 - 20 vs 12 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.44/FPS
100%
Price, €
€695.4
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €695.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Mar 16th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon X5650 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Xeon | Collection | Core i9 |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |